UDC 624.19 UDC 69.058.2

MODERN APPROACHES TO MONITORING DEFORMATIONS OF TRANSPORT TUNNELS: TECHNOLOGIES, PRINCIPLES AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS Modern approaches to monitoring deformations of transport tunnels: technologies, principles and development trends

Published in Smart composite in construction · Volume 7, Issue 3, 2026 · Pages 46–63 · Rubric: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, SUBWAYS, AIRPORTS, BRIDGES AND TRANSPORT TUNNELS
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52957/2782-1919-2026-7-3-46-63
Received: 05.06.2026 Accepted: 25.08.2026 Published: 23.09.2026
The article examines the evolution of transport tunnel monitoring – from episodic geodetic observations to modern digital systems. The relevance of the study is due to the aging of a significant part of the tunnel stock, the increasing complexity of geotechnical conditions, and the growing safety requirements for infrastructure. Based on an analysis of the advanced European school, key monitoring principles have been identified, including continuity, multi‑channel data acquisition, integration with computational models, and operational feedback. Stationary structural health monitoring (SHM) systems, mobile systems based on terrestrial and mobile laser scanning, as well as distributed fiber-optic sensing systems are examined. A comparative analysis of monitoring methods is conducted in terms of accuracy, spatial coverage, and operating mode. Key trends in the industry are shown: the move toward real‑time measurements, integration with digital twins, and the implementation of machine learning. The limitations of existing solutions are presented: the predominance of “fixation” monitoring and the formalization of tasks related to the early detection of deformation processes. The necessity of transitioning from monitoring as a “state survey” to predictive safety and lifecycle‑oriented management of tunnels, including in the context of the digital transformation of the industry, is substantiated.
tunnel monitoring, European school, early deformation warning, laser scanning, fiber optic sensors, digital twin
Text References
Text (RU) (PDF)
Read Download

1. Volokhov, E.M., Novozhenin, S.Iu. and Bac, Nguen Suan (2012), Modern displacement and deformation control systems in underground construction, Journal of Mining Institute, vol. 199, pp. 253-259. Available at: https://pmi.spmi.ru/pmi/article/view/5854 (accessed 06.05.2026) (in Russian).

2. Lebedev, M.O., Bezrodnii, K.P. and Shliaev, S.A. (2023), Long-term geotechnical monitoring in tunnels as a forecasting tool, Underground Expert. Available at: https://undergroundexpert.info/issledovaniya-i-tehnologii/dolgosrochnyj-geotehnicheskim-monitoring (accessed 06.05.2026) (in Russian).

3. Emelianov, M.V. (2024), Features of developing advanced monitoring systems for load-bearing structures of buildings and structures, Construction Science and Education. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-razrabotki-perspektivnyh-sistem-monitoringa-nesuschih-konstruktsiy-zdaniy-i-sooruzheniy (accessed 06.05.2026) (in Russian).

4. Jiang, Y., Zhutian, Pan and Xuepeng, Zhang (2025), Tunnel infrastructure health management: A state of the art review on defect development mechanism and robot-aided inspection system, Smart Underground Engineering, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 26-39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sue.2025.05.003.

5. Apoji, D., Soga, K. and Sheil, B.B. (2023), Shaping the future of tunneling with data and emerging technologies, Data-Centric Engineering, vol. 4, p. e29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2023.24.

6. Zhang, X., Zhu, H., Jiang, X. and Broere, W. (2024), Distributed fiber optic sensors for tunnel monitoring: A state-of-the-art review, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 3841-3863. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.01.008.

7. Monsberger, C.M., Bauer, P., Buchmayer, F. and Lienhart, W. (2022), Large-scale distributed fiber optic sensing network for short and long-term integrity monitoring of tunnel linings, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1317-1327. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-022-00560-w.

8. Buchmayer, F. and Bergmeister, K. (2021), Überwachung und Monitoring als lebenszyklus-begleitende Instrumente bei Infrastrukturtunneln, Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, vol. 116 (S2), pp. 58-67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/best.202100055.

9. Cheng, G., Wang, Z., Li, G., Shi, B., Wu, J., Cao, D. and Nie, Y. (2025), Advanced research and engineering application of tunnel structural health monitoring leveraging spatiotemporally continuous fiber optic sensing information, Photonics, vol. 12 (9), p. 855. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12090855.

10. Pastushkov, V.G., Vaitovich, A.N., Kostiukovich, O.V. and Iankovskii, L.V. (2021), Application practice of automated structural monitoring system for transport facilitie, Transport. Transport Structures. Ecology, no. 4, pp. 77-90 (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.15593/24111678/2021.04.09.

11. Chen, W., Tan, X.-Y. and Yang, J. (2025), Review of state-of-the-art in structural health monitoring of tunnel engineering, Smart Underground Engineering, no.1 (1), pp. 40-50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sue.2025.05.004.

12. Liu, Y. and Li, J. (2022), Full-section deformation monitoring of high altitude fault tunnels using 3D laser scanner, Advances in Civil Engineering, Art. 4967037. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4967037.

13. DZSF. (2024) Forschungsbericht 64/2024: Sensorbasierte Technologien im Bahnsystem: Markt- und Technologieanalyse. Deutsches Zentrum für Schienenverkehrsforschung. Available at: https://www.dzsf.bund.de (accessed 06.05.2026).

14. Kolotovichev, Iu.A. and Shakhramanian, A.M. (2022), Automated deformation monitoring of load-bearing structures of the Ekaterinburg Arena, Vestnik MGSU (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2022.3.314-330.

15. ASTRA 84012. (2023–2025) Überwachung des baulichen Zustands von Kunstbauten — Tunnel. Bundesamt für Strassen (ASTRA), Bern. Available at: https://www.astra.admin.ch (accessed 06.05.2026).

16. Huang, H., Zhang, D., Wang, C. and Tang, A. (2021), A review of defects in urban metro tunnels, Underground Space, no. 6 (3), pp. 243-264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2020.01.004.

17. Perminov, N.A. (2021), Modeling and monitoring of structural safety of unique underground facilities of large city drainage systems in complex soil conditions, Construction and Geotechnics. (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9826/2021.1.03

18. Sun, Z., Jayasinghe, S., Sidiq, A., Shahrivar, F. and Mahmoodian, M. (2024), Approach towards the development of digital twin for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure: A comprehensive review, Sensors, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010059.

19. Afrazi, M., Armaghani, D.J., Afrazi, H., Fattahi, H. and Samui, P. (2025), Real-time monitoring of tunnel structures using digital twin and artificial intelligence: A short overview, Deep Underground Science and Engineering, vol. 5 (2), pp. 315-330. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/dug2.70029.

20. Li, J., Liu, C., Zhang, Y. and Gu, X. (2024), Structural health monitoring of subway tunnel based on fiber Bragg grating sensors and video displacement meters, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 38, no. 5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/JCCEE5.CPENG-7644.

21. Machado, L.B., Santos, R., Vega Ruiz, D. and Bittencourt, T. (2025), Advancements of digital twin technology for bridges and tunnels: A systematic literature review, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, no. 31 (4). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2745.

22. Sheil, B.B., Suryasentana, S.K., Mooney, M.A. and Zhu, H. (2022), Machine learning to inform tunnelling operations: recent advances and future trends, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Geotechnical Engineering, no. 175 (5), pp. 412-428. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.20.00011.

23. Que, H., Gao, H., Shan, W., Yang, X. and Zhao, R. (2024), Deformation measurement of tunnel cross-section by mobile laser scanning system, Sensors, vol. 24, no. 22, p. 7297. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227297.

24. Kuang, G., Li, B., Mo, S., Hu, X. and Li, L. (2022), Review on machine learning-based defect detection on shield tunnel lining, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 943-957. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.19859.

25. Ma, L., Lin, F., Du, Y., Ren, S. and Long, N. (2024), Tunnel surrounding rock deformation prediction via WOA LSTM model, Scientific Reports, vol. 14, Art. 29170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79059-x.

26. Zhang, X., Minghao, W., Feng, Dan and Jingchun, W. (2024), Risk classification and early warning of large deformation of soft rock in tunnels based on CNN-LSTM model, Scientific Reports, vol. 14 (1), Art. 29944. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81816-x.

27. Zhou, S., Peng, H., Zheng, H. and He, X. (2026), A deep learning method fusing multiscale temporal features for metro tunnel deformation advanced prediction, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 40, no. 5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/JCCEE5.CPENG-7244.

28. Yang, Z., Cheng, Z. and Wu, D. (2025), Deep learning driven prediction and comparative study of surrounding rock deformation in high speed railway tunnels, Scientific Reports, 15, Art. 24104. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09791-5.

29. Kochetkov, A.V., Semenova, N.S., Ivanov, A.F. and Chizhikov, I.A. (2022), Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Use for the Inspection of Transport Infrastructure Facilities, Smart Composite in Construction, vol. 3, iss. 4, pp. 28 38. Available at: http://comincon.ru/index.php/tor/issue/view/V3N4_2022 (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.52957/27821919_2022_4_28.

30. Boguslavskii, L.A. and Provatorova, G.V. (2025), The use of artificial intelligence within the design of automobile roads, Smart Composite in Construction, vol. 6, iss. 4, pp. 67-79 (in Russian). DOI:https://doi.org/10.52957/2782-1919-2025-6-4-67-79.