Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
Submit manuscript
JOURNAL OF REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
Journals / JOURNAL OF REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS / Volume 3 Issue 2 / JUSTICE VS. EFFICIENCY: WHICH IS MORE COMPETITIVE IN THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC MODEL OF THE DIGITAL SOCIETY?

JUSTICE VS. EFFICIENCY: WHICH IS MORE COMPETITIVE IN THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC MODEL OF THE DIGITAL SOCIETY?

Published in JOURNAL OF REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS · Pages 65–71 · Rubric: OPEN DISCUSSION
Received: 05.03.2022 Accepted: 06.10.2022 Published: 16.06.2024 Language of publication: ENG
Authors
GA
Galina Rodina
ORCID
ABSTRACT
The paper analyses the impact of the emerging digital society on the evolution of the role played by efficiency and fairness in the competitiveness of contemporary socio-economic models and highlights the reasons provide this evolution. The author dwells on developing of economical society, the confrontation of efficiency and justice. This confrontation is traditional one and recently is replaced by their equal coexistence, growing into the priority of justice as a major condition for modern progress in the future. It allows us to consider incomplete socio-economic reforms in modern Russia. It is generally associating with the disregard of society’s usual understanding of justice, which automatically failed any social reforms.
KEYWORDS
competitiveness, justice, efficiency, socio-economic model, digital society, social innovation, worldview matrix, sociocultural foundations of society.
Text References
Text
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Subetto, A. I. (2017). One Hundred years after the Great October Revolution: the ecological finale of US imperialism and the noosphere-socialist revolution as an imperative for humanity’s survival. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika, (3), 28-40. Retrieved from https://www.ystu.ru/3-2017.pdf (in Russian).

2. Tolkachev, S. A., & Teplyakov, A. Y. (2019). The Concept of Cyclical Sequence of Basic Technology Diffusion in the Economy and Ontological Conditionality of Theories of Industrial Society. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, (4), 19-36 (in Russian).

3. Khubiev, K. A. (2022). On the transitional forms of the “fading” of economic relations in the theoretical model of noonomy. Noonomika I nooobshchestvo. Al’manah trudov INIR im. S.YU. Vitte, 1(1), 101-114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37930/2782-618X-2022-1-1-101-114 (in Russian).

4. Belyaev, S., & Koshkin, V. (2020). Can an economy be solidary? Ekspert, (14), 1158 (in Russian).

5. Bodrunov, S. D. (2018). Noonomics. The future: the fourth technological revolution necessitates profound changes in economic and social life. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, (2), 5-13 (in Russian).

6. Kretov, S. (2019). The theory and practice of human coexistence with nature. M.: Dobrotvorenie (in Russian).

7. Korolev, I. S. (Ed.). (2003). The world economy: global trends over 100 years. M.: Yurist (in Russian).

8. Schumpeter, J. A. (2008). A theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. M.: Eksmo (in Russian).

9. Marshall, A. (1993). Principles of economic science. M.: Progress (in Russian).

10. Volkonsky, V. A., & Kuzovkin, A. I. (2008). Problems of gaining perspective. Russia’s strategic challenges in the context of global trends // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii, (4), 7-27 (in Russian).

11. Erhard, L. (2001). Prosperity for all. M.: Delo (in Russian).

12. Nureyev, R.M. (2008). Development economics: models for establishing a market economy. M.: Norma (in Russian).

13. Weber, M. (2017). Selected: An image of society. 3rd edition, revised and enlarged. M.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ (in Russian).

14. Polterovich, V., Dmitriev, M., Yakovlev, A., Gurvich, E., & Auzan, A. (2017). The fate of economic programs and reforms in Russia (Proceedings of the roundtable discussion at the XVIII April international academic conference on economic and social development). Voprosy Ekonomiki, (6), 22-44. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-6-22-44 (in Russian).

15. Auzan, A. A. (2006). Contract-2008. Part one. Who to negotiate with? Retrieved from https://m.polit. ru/article/2006/02/26/auzan/ (Accessed 01.05.2022)

16. Kara-Murza, S. G. (2013). Russian communism. Theory, Practice, Tasks. M.: Algorithm (in Russian).

17. Kara-Murza, S. G. (2020). Matrix. The history of Russian attitudes to the history of commodity-money relations. M.: Alistorus (in Russian).

18. Lotman, Yu. M. (2002). History and typology of Russian culture. SPb.: Iskusstvo-SPb (in Russian).

19. Rodina, G. A. (2021). Old analogue normality vs new digital normality in a competitive coordinate system, Journal of regional and international competitiveness, 5(4), 4-12. Retrieved from http://jraic.com/index.php/tor

20. Grechko, P. K. (2015). The Ontomethodological Discourse of Modernity: Historical Advancement and its Challenges. M.: Lenand (in Russian).

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
PDF Text JATS XML
The contact persons
Chief Editor
Svetlana Rastvortseva
Deputy Chief Editor
Sergei Shkiotov
shkiotovsv@ystu.ru
Executive editor
Maksim Markin
markinmi@ystu.ru
Scientific consultant
Valery Gordeev
vagordeev@rambler.ru
5009
downloads
Crossref RINC Antiplagiat Cyberleninka VAK Anri Dimensions Scilit Open Alex Semantic scholar RCSI Ulrichs
CC
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Creative Commons
© chemintech.ru
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Support Powered by Editorum, 2026 Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot your password?