Informaciya dlya avtorov

Redakciya strogo priderzhivaetsya norm i pravil mezhdunarodnoy publikacionnoy etiki.

Pravovuyu osnovu obespecheniya publikacionnoy etiki sostavlyayut mezhdunarodnye standarty: polozheniya II Vsemirnoy konferencii po voprosam soblyudeniya dobrosovestnosti nauchnyh issledovaniy, polozheniya Komiteta po etike nauchnyh publikaciy (The Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE) i normy razdela «Avtorskoe pravo» Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF. 

Predstavlenie stat'i v zhurnal podrazumevaet sleduyuschee:

• rabota ne byla opublikovana v drugom zhurnale;
• rabota ne nahoditsya na rassmotrenii v drugom zhurnale;
• vse soavtory soglasny s publikaciey stat'i;
• polucheno soglasie (v yavnoy ili neyavnoy forme) organizacii, na baze kotoroy  provedeno issledovanie.

Pri predstavlenii rukopisi v zhurnal avtory dolzhny ubedit'sya, chto vse citirovaniya oformleny korrektno, ukazany zaimstvovannye istochniki v podpisyah k risunkam i nadpisyam k tablicam. Esli takovye ne privedeny, predpolagaetsya, chto risunki i tablicy predstavlyayut soboy plod avtorskoy deyatel'nosti. Redakciya osuschestvlyaet proverku statey na antiplagiat i otklonyaet ili vozvraschaet avtoram rukopisi, esli original'nost' tekstov po rezul'tatam takoy proverki ne dostigaet 70-75 %.

Avtorskie prava

Avtory, napravlyayuschie svoi raboty v zhurnal, soglashayutsya so sleduyuschim:

1. Avtory sohranyayut za soboy avtorskie prava na rabotu i predostavlyayut zhurnalu pravo pervoy publikacii.
2. Avtory sohranyayut za soboy pravo zaklyuchat' otdel'nye kontraktnye dogovorennosti, kasayuschiesya neeksklyuzivnogo rasprostraneniya versii raboty v opublikovannom v zhurnale vide (naprimer, razmeschenie v institutskom hranilische, publikaciya v knige), so ssylkoy na original'nuyu publikaciyu v dannom zhurnale.

Privatnost'

Imena i adresa elektronnoy pochty, vvedennye na sayte dannogo zhurnala, ispol'zuyutsya isklyuchitel'no dlya dostizheniya celey, sovpadayuschih s missiey zhurnala; dostup k nim inyh lic i organizaciy dlya drugih celey ne predostavlyaetsya.

Pravila oformleniya statey dlya zhurnala

«Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve» / «Smart Comprosite in Construction»

V zhurnale «Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve Smart Composite in Construction» pechatayutsya raboty prepodavateley i sotrudnikov vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy RF, RAN, RAASN i drugih issledovatel'skih organizaciy, rabotayuschih v sfere promyshlennogo i grazhdanskogo stroitel'stva i arhitektury, v tom chisle – zarubezhnyh.

Rubriki zhurnala

• Stroitel'nye konstrukcii, zdaniya i sooruzheniya (tehnicheskie)
• Stroitel'nye materialy i izdeliya (tehnicheskie)
• Proektirovanie i stroitel'stvo dorog, metropolitenov, aerodromov, mostov i transportnyh tonneley (tehnicheskie)
• Arhitektura zdaniy i sooruzheniy. Tvorcheskie koncepcii arhitekturnoy deyatel'nosti (tehnicheskie nauki; arhitektura)

Stat'i, napravlyaemye v zhurnal, dolzhny udovletvoryat' sleduyuschim trebovaniyam:

1. Stat'ya dolzhna sootvetstvovat' profilyu i rubrikam zhurnala, obladat' aktual'nost'yu, noviznoy, imet' prikladnoe znachenie (i/ili teoreticheskoe obosnovanie). Vopros ob opublikovanii ili otklonenii stat'i reshaet redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala, i ee reshenie yavlyaetsya okonchatel'nym.
2. Stat'i dolzhny predstavlyat' szhatoe, konkretnoe izlozhenie rezul'tatov, bez povtoreniya odnih i teh zhe dannyh v tekste, risunkah i tablicah.
3. Vse predstavlennye stat'i dolzhny byt' nabrany 12 keglem, shrift Times New Roman, interval – 1.1. Polya: verhnee i nizhnee – 3 sm, levoe i pravoe – 2.5 sm. Abzacnyy otstup – 0.75 sm. Ob'em stat'i – 7-15 stranic, vklyuchaya annotaciyu i spisok literatury na russkom i angliyskom yazykah; chislo tablic – ne bolee 3, risunkov – ne bolee 5-6, dlya obzornoy stat'i – ne bolee 8, v tom chisle pomechennyh bukvami a, b (kursiv) i t.d. Risunki, kak i tablicy, podpisi i zagolovki k nim, a takzhe primechaniya, razmeschayutsya po tekstu stat'i. V razdel «Obzornye stat'i» prinimayutsya materialy ob'emom ot 20 do 30-35 stranic.
4. Pri oformlenii stat'i rekomenduetsya izbegat' upotrebleniya lyubyh sokrascheniy, krome obscheprinyatyh. Pervoe upominanie sokraschennogo termina obyazatel'no sleduet posle ego predstavleniya v polnom vide. Rukopisnye vstavki ne dopuskayutsya. Kavychki oformlyayutsya «elochkoy». Tekst nabiraetsya bez numeracii stranic.

Struktura stat'i

Pervaya stranica rukopisi oformlyaetsya shriftom s razmerom 12 pt. Na pervoy stroke ukazyvaetsya tip stat'i s vyravnivaniem sleva bez abzacnyh otstupov (Nauchnaya stat'ya, Obzornaya stat'ya). Na sleduyuschey stroke prostavlyaetsya indeks po universal'noy desyatichnoy klassifikacii (UDK). Posle UDK propuskaetsya odna stroka i daetsya po centru naimenovanie raboty (poluzhirnoe nachertanie). Propuskaetsya odna stroka i privodyatsya I.O. Familiya (poluzhirnoe nachertanie) kazhdogo avtora. Posle familii kazhdogo avtora nadstrochnym simvolom ukazyvaetsya snoska na affiliaciyu v vide cifry. Esli vse avtory predstavlyayut odnu i tu zhe organizaciyu, cifrovoe oboznachenie affiliacii ne ukazyvaetsya. Propuskaetsya odna stroka, nachinaya s pervogo nadstrochnogo nomera affiliacii, privoditsya polnoe Imya, Otchestvo, Familiya avtora (ili avtorov, esli takovyh, predstavlyayuschih dannuyu organizaciyu, neskol'ko), zatem, na sleduyuschey stroke  – naimenovanie organizacii (mesta raboty), goroda, strany i elektronnyy adres (kursiv) kazhdogo avtora iz dannoy organizacii. Propuskaetsya odna stroka i privoditsya polnoe Imya, Otchestvo, Familiya avtora (ili avtorov) drugoy organizacii, a na sleduyuschey stroke – naimenovanie drugoy organizacii (mesta raboty), goroda, strany i elektronnyy adres (kursiv). Propuskaetsya stroka, razmeschaetsya annotaciya so slov «Annotaciya.» ('Abstract.') (s tochkoy). Tekst annotacii dolzhen vklyuchat' 150-250 slov, vypolnennyh kursivnym nezhirnym nachertaniem, i zavershaetsya tochkoy. Posle annotacii i propuska odnoy stroki nabiraetsya «Klyuchevye slova:» ('Keywords:') (s dvoetochiem) i privoditsya 6-10 slovosochetaniy s kursivnym nachertaniem, bez tochki v konce. Cherez stroku ukazyvaetsya avtor, otvetstvennyy za perepisku, i ego elektronnaya pochta (kursivom). Vse vysheopisannye punkty sledom privodyatsya na angliyskom yazyke.

Blagodarnosti organizaciyam, nauchnym rukovoditelyam i drugim licam, okazavshim pomosch' pri napisanii stat'i, privodyatsya posle slova «Blagodarnosti:». Na angliyskom yazyke slova blagodarnosti privodyatsya posle slova 'Acknowledgments:'

Svedeniya o grantah i finansirovanii issledovaniya pri podgotovke i publikacii stat'i mogut byt' privedeny posle slova «Finansirovanie:» (na angliyskom yazyke – posle slov 'Funding:' ili 'Financial Support:').

Na pervoy stranice rukopisi (esli stat'ya predstavlena na angliyskom yazyke) vse vysheopisannye punkty privodyatsya tol'ko na angliyskom yazyke.

Osnovnoy tekst nauchnoy stat'i rekomenduetsya izlagat' soglasno strukture IMRAD, soderzhaschey sleduyuschie zagolovki: Vvedenie, Eksperimental'naya chast', Rezul'taty i ih obsuzhdenie, Vyvody, Spisok istochnikov. Kazhdyy zagolovok privoditsya propisnymi bukvami vysotoy 12 pt i vydelyaetsya odnoy pustoy strokoy pered nim i posle nego.

Risunki oformlyayutsya vnutri teksta, perenos strok podpisey na druguyu stranicu ne dopuskaetsya. Podpisi k risunkam privodyatsya srazu pod graficheskim izobrazheniem. Podpis' risunka sostavlyaetsya iz sokrascheniya «Ris.» (ili 'Fig.' dlya stat'i na angliyskom yazyke ili dlya perevoda podpisi), poryadkovogo nomera i otdelennogo tochkoy nazvaniya risunka, pri etom tekst, krome samogo nazvaniya, vydelyaetsya poluzhirnym nachertaniem. Sledom v stat'e na russkom yazyke privoditsya podpis' risunka na angliyskom yazyke. Esli risunok sostoit iz neskol'kih chastey, pomechennyh otdel'nymi bukvami, perenos lyuboy chasti risunka i primechaniya v vide bukvy na druguyu stranicu ne rekomenduetsya. Rekomenduetsya umen'shenie shrifta dlya podpisi do 10 pt (dopuskaetsya do 8 pt). Risunki raspolagayutsya tol'ko posle ih upominaniya (ili perekrestnoy ssylki) v tekste stat'i. Ssylka na kazhdyy risunok po tekstu stat'i privoditsya v obyazatel'nom poryadke i  privoditsya v skobkah s sokrascheniem «ris.» ('Fig.'), posle kotorogo ukazyvaetsya nomer, naprimer: (ris. 1) – pri predstavlenii raboty na russkom yazyke, (Fig. 1) – pri predstavlenii raboty na angliyskom yazyke.

Formuly rekomenduetsya oformlyat' vnutri tablicy, sostoyaschey iz dvuh stolbcov. V pervom stolbce privoditsya sama formula, oformlennaya redaktorom formul ili v vide izobrazheniya. Vo vtorom stolbce shirinoy 1 sm privoditsya poryadkovyy nomer formuly, zaklyuchennyy v skobki pri sozdanii perekrestnyh ssylok v tekste. Esli neobhodimost' davat' perekrestnye ssylki otsutstvuet, vtoroy stolbec ne sozdayut. Posle formuly stavitsya zapyataya, kogda privoditsya rasshifrovka simvolov formuly, ili tochka; poryadkovyy nomer formuly posle zapyatoy ili tochki raspolagaetsya na etoy zhe stroke, s vyravnivaniem po pravomu krayu.

Dlya stateynyh tablic privoditsya oboznachenie «Tablica» (ili 'Table' dlya stat'i na angliyskom yazyke), poryadkovyy nomer (bez oboznacheniya znaka nomera), a posle tochki daetsya naimenovanie tablicy. Tekst, krome samogo naimenovaniya tablicy vydelyaetsya poluzhirnym nachertaniem. Sledom v stat'e na russkom yazyke privoditsya nazvanie tablicy na angliyskom yazyke. Rekomenduetsya umen'shenie shrifta v tablice do 10 pt (dopuskaetsya do 8 pt). Tablicy raspolagayutsya tol'ko posle ih upominaniya (ili perekrestnoy ssylki) v tekste stat'i. Upominanie privedennoy tablicy po tekstu stat'i yavlyaetsya obyazatel'nym i privoditsya v skobkah, v kotoryh dayut oboznachenie, naprimer: (tabl. 1) – pri predstavlenii raboty na russkom yazyke, ( Table 1) – pri predstavlenii raboty na angliyskom yazyke.

Stat'ya zakanchivaetsya razdelom «Spisok istochnikov» (v stat'e na angliyskom yazyke –  razdelom 'References'), shrift Times New Roman, kegl' 10 pt. Optimal'noe kolichestvo citirovannyh istochnikov ot 15 do 20 (no ne menee 10), pri etom v spisok rekomenduetsya vklyuchit' ne menee 3 rabot, predstavlyayuschih zhurnaly iz yadra RINC ili vhodyaschih v bazy dannyh WoS/Scopus. V obzornyh rabotah prinimaetsya ne menee 40-50 ssylok na literaturnye istochniki. Pod spiskom literaturnyh istochnikov privodyatsya nadpisi kursivom, kazhdaya – s novoy stroki: «Postupila v redakciyu», «Odobrena posle recenzirovaniya», «Prinyata k opublikovaniyu».

Format

Redakciya prinimaet teksty, sohranennye v formatah .doc. ili .docx. Materialy, ne sootvetstvuyuschie ukazannym trebovaniyam i predstavlennye v drugih formatah, ne rassmatrivayutsya.

Oformlenie literaturnyh ssylok

Vse zatekstovye bibliograficheskie ssylki v stat'e na russkom yazyke sostavlyayut po GOST R 7.0.5 i GOST R 7.0.100, v stat'e na angliyskom yazyke – soglasno mezhdunarodnomu stilyu oformleniya Harvard.

Dopolnitel'no v stat'e na russkom yazyke privodyat perechen' zatekstovyh bibliograficheskih ssylok na latinice ('References'), soglasno mezhdunarodnomu stilyu oformleniya Harvard.

Izdaniya, kotorye ne perevodyatsya, neobhodimo ukazat' transliteraciey v sootvetstvii s obscheprinyatymi mezhdunarodnymi pravilami, v konce kazhdogo takogo istochnika dolzhna stoyat' pometka (in Russian) (sm. http://www.cas.org/expertise/cascontent/caplus/corejournals.html).

Dlya zhurnal'noy stat'i dolzhny byt' ukazany familii i inicialy vseh avtorov, nazvanie stat'i, sokraschennoe nazvanie zhurnala (esli dopuskaetsya, naprimer: Izv. vuzov. Himiya i him. tehnologiya) god, nomer toma, nomer ili vypusk, diapazon stranic i DOI (pri ih nalichii, v sluchae, esli citiruemaya stat'ya napechatana na russkom yazyke).

Primery oformleniya literaturnyh istochnikov (stat'i, monografii, patenty na izobretenie, internet-dannye)
na russkom i angliyskom yazykah

SPISOK ISTOChNIKOV

1. Treybaks E.A. Ispol'zovanie unikal'nyh svoystv kleenyh derevyannyh paneley CLT v stroitel'stve obschestvennyh zdaniy // Innovacii v nauke. 2017.  № 10 (71). S. 68-69.

2. Ammari M.S., Belhadj B., Bederina M., Ferhat A., Quéneudec M. Contribution of hybrid fibers on the improvement of sand concrete properties: Barley straws treated with hot water and steel fibers // Construction and building materials. 2020. Vol. 233, no. 8. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.117374

3. Titunin A.A., Zayceva K.V. Proektirovanie i proizvodstvo stroitel'nyh materialov iz drevesiny. Kompleksnyy podhod. Kostroma: Izd-vo Kostrom. gos. tehnol. un-ta, 2009. 185 s.

4. Yargina Z.N. Estetika goroda. M.: Stroyizdat, 1991. 365 s.

5. V Rossii budet obespecheno shirokoe vnedrenie mnogoetazhnogo derevyannogo domostroeniya // Minstroy Rossii: [sayt]. URL: https://minstroyrf.gov.ru/press/v-rossii-budet-obespecheno-shirokoe-vnedrenie-mnogoetazhnogo-derevyannogo-domostroeniya/ (data obrascheniya 10.10.2023). 

6. Citation guides / Mendeley [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.mendeley.com/guides/citation-guides/ (data obrascheniya: 05.04.2022).

7. Patent № 2667367 Rossiyskaya Federaciya, MPK B28C 5/00 (2006.01), B28C 9/02 (2006.01). Sposob polucheniya betonnoy smesi s utilizaciey ranee poluchennyh ostatkov etoy smesi: opubl. 19.09.2018 / Kogan Artem Sergeevich.

Postupila v redakciyu 
Odobrena posle recenzirovaniya 
Prinyata k opublikovaniyu

REFERENCES

1. Treybaks, E. A. (2017) Utilization of unique properties of glued wood CLT panels in the construction of public buildings, Innovatsii v nauke, 10(71), pp. 68-69 (in Russian).

2. Ammari, M. S., Belhadj, B., Bederina, M., Ferhat, A. & Quéneudec, M. (2020) Contribution of hybrid fibers on the improvement of sand concrete properties: Barley straws treated with hot water and steel fibers, Construction and Building Materials, 233(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117374.

3. Titunin, A. A. & Zaitseva, K. V. (2009) Design and production of construction materials of wood. Complex approach. Kostroma: Izd-vo Kostrom. gos. tekhnol. un-ta (in Russian).

4. Yargina, Z. N. (1991) Aesthetics of the city. Moscow: Stroyizdat (in Russian).

5. Ministry of Construction of Russia. (2022) Russia will ensure widespread introduction of multi-storey wooden house building [online]. Available at: https://minstroyrf.gov.ru/press/v-rossii-budet-obespecheno-shirokoe-vnedrenie-mnogoetazhnogo-derevyannogo-domostroeniya (accessed 10.10.2023) (in Russian).

6. Citation Guides / Mendeley [online]. Available at: https://www.mendeley.com/guides/citation-guides/ (accessed 05.04.2022).

7. Ferrari, G., Surico, F., Brocchi, A., Banfi, E., Maltese, C. & Squinzi, M. (2019) Method for recycling concrete, IT, Patent EP 2,468,695 A1.

Received
Approved after reviewing
Accepted

Publication Ethics

Ethical standards for publication exist to ensure high-quality scientific publications, public trust in scientific findings, and that people receive credit for their work and ideas. Journal Smart Composite in Construction publication ethics and research integrity help to ensure the accuracy and trustworthiness of an article. We adhere the provisions of the II World Conference on the Integrity of Scientific Research, the provisions of the Committee on Ethics of Scientific Publications (The Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE).

1. Authorship and Authors' Responsibilities

1.1. When submitting a manuscript to the Journal, author (authors) confirming the manuscript has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract, a published lecture or academic thesis), the manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and checked for plagiarism from other publications. In case the work is based on material previously published as a report, preprint, proceedings, etc. author (authors) should inform the Editorial Board.

1.2. Authors are the persons who have contributed sufficiently to the research, analysis, etc. to be listed on the byline of the manuscript. Before submitting, all authors must approve the manuscript and give their consent for submission and publication. The Corresponding author takes primary responsibility for communication with the Journal during the manuscript submission, peer review, and publication process. The Corresponding Author informs the co-authors of the manuscript’s status throughout the submission, review, and publication process.

1.3. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation.

1.4. The author (authors) guarantees the absence of plagiarism in the manuscript. In case the fragments of works or statements of other persons are used, the authors provide appropriate bibliographic references or citations. In case of using of other researchers works or statements, the authors provide appropriate bibliographic references or quotations.

1.5. Authors should prevent self-plagiarism and refer to their previous works correctly. Author (authors) is not allowed to present the identical data in several publications, copying and paraphrasing the same information.

1.6. The authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed as influencing the results or interpretation of their manuscript.

1.7. When an author (authors) discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the authors obligation to promptly notify the Journal Editor and cooperate with the Journal to retract or correct the work.

2. Reviewers Roles and Responsibilities

2.1. Reviewing upholds the integrity of the Journal by identifying invalid research and helping to maintain the quality of the Journal. Our collaborative peer review maximizes manuscript quality by using a rigorous, constructive, and transparent review process managed by active researchers. Moreover, reviewing is a necessary component of formal scholarly communications providing accomplished academic approach. We believe, the authors can ensure the rigorous standards of the scientific process by taking part in the peer-review system.

2.2. An insufficiently competent or time-constrained reviewer should promptly notify the Editor and request to be excluded from the manuscript review process.

2.3. Any manuscript submitted is a confidential document. This paper not be discussed with any other individual not authorised by the Editor.

2.4. The reviewer is obliged to assess the manuscript objectively. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.

2.5. Reviewers should pay attention to substantial drawbacks and gaps in the references. Any statement (argument, conclusion, etc.) published previously in the manuscript should be accompanied by an appropriate reference. Reviewers should identify works that are relevant to the paper, which were not referred to by the authors. Every allegation that an observation, conclusion, or argument has been made previously must be supported by a reference. The reviewer should also draw the Editor's attention to any significant similarities and intersections between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which he or she is personally aware.

2.6. Unpublished materials contained in the submitted manuscript should not be used in the reviewer's own research without the explicit written consent of the author (authors). The information or ideas obtained during the review should remain confidential and not be used for personal purposes until the publication of the paper and without the permission of the author (authors). Information or ideas obtained during the reviewing related to benefits should be kept confidential.

2.7. Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, and other interactions and relationships with any of the authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.

3. Editors Responsibilities

3.1. The Editor of the Journal is solely and independently responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the Journal should be published. Validation of the work in question and of its importance to researchers and readers must always support such decisions. Basis of the publication decision is always the scientific relevance of the work, its relevance and significance, scientific novelty, and reliability.

The Editor makes objective decision regardless of commercial considerations and provides fair and efficient review process.

3.2. The Editor evaluates the articles for their intellectual content, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

3.3. The Editor should not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial consultants, and the publisher, as the case may be.

3.4. Editors manage conflict situations arising in the process and use all available methods to resolve them.

3.5. An Editor presented with convincing evidence that the substance or conclusions of a published article are erroneous should promote the publication of a correction or retraction.

4. Publisher Responsibilities 

4.1. The publisher follows principles and procedures that facilitate the performance of ethical duties by editors, reviewers, and authors in accordance with these requirements. The publisher should be sure that its overall revenue setting did not influence the Editors' decision making.

4.2. The publisher should adopt policies and procedures that support editors, reviewers, and authors of the Journal in performing their ethical duties under these ethics guidelines. The publisher should support editors in the review of complaints raised concerning ethical issues and help communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors.

4.3. The publisher should develop codes of practice and inculcate industry standards for best practice on ethical matters, errors, and retractions.

5. Articles withdrawal and retraction

When considering situations related to the withdrawal(retraction) of articles, the Editorial Board and publisher of the Journal Smart Composites in Construction are guided by the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE Retraction Guidelines) and Alliance of Independent Regional Publishers, AIRP (The Rules of Withdrawal (Retraction) of an Article from Publication).

Reasons for withdrawal of an article:

• falsification is publishing data or conclusions that were not generated by experiments or observations by data manipulation.
• duplication of submitted materials in several editions.
• plagiarism.

If authors wish to withdraw an article after it has been accepted, they should communicate their decision to the Journal's Editorial Board as soon as possible. The process may involve sending an official withdrawal request along with a brief explanation of the reason for the withdrawal.

After withdrawal, the article remains on the Journal's website as part of the corresponding issue and retains the DOI identifier but is marked as withdrawn one. A note to that effect is made in the issues' Table of Contents. The original article is retained unchanged except for a watermark on the .pdf indicating on each page that it is “retracted.”

The Editorial Board publishes a statement on the withdrawal of the article with the reasons and the date of retraction on the official website of the Journal and in the forthcoming printed issue.

Information on withdrawal of the article and its PDF-version with appropriate labelling are sent to the National Electronic Library (elibrary.ru) and other bibliographic bases the Journal included. The information is also submitted to the Alliance of Independent Regional Publishers, AIRP for entry it into the Unified Database of Retracted Articles.

Publication fee

No fee is charged from the authors during the submission, evaluation, and publication process.

The Editorial Board does not charge the authors for the manuscript submission, reviewing, or publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in own research without the express written consent of the author (authors).

Information or ideas obtained during the reviewing related to benefits should be kept confidential.

Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, and other interactions and relationships with any of the authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.

Plagiarism

The Editorial Board of the Journal  Smart Composites in Construction, when reviewing the manuscript can undergo a multi-step anti-plagiarism check independently verify the received materials using the Anti-Plagiarism system. In case of plagiarism detection, the Editorial Board acts in accordance with COPE rules.

Preprint and Postprint Policy

When submitting an article, the author is required to confirm the manuscript has not been published or accepted for publication in another scientific Journal. When referring to an article published in the Journal Smart Composites in Construction, the publisher asks you to place a link (the full URL of the material) on the official website of the Journal.

Articles previously posted by authors on personal or public sites not affiliated with other publishers are allowed for review

Polozhenie o recenzirovanii rukopisey v zhurnale

«Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve» / «Smart Comprosite in Construction»

1. Obschie polozheniya

1.1 Nastoyaschee Polozhenie ustanavlivaet proceduru ekspertnoy ocenki rukopisey, napravlyaemyh v redakciyu zhurnala «Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve Smart Composite in Construction».

1.2 Cel'yu ekspertnoy ocenki yavlyaetsya obespechenie vysokogo kachestva materialov, publikuemyh na stranicah zhurnala.

1.3 Dannoe Polozhenie razrabotano v sootvetstvii s publikacionnoy etikoy zhurnala «Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve Smart Composite in Construction». 

2. Poryadok recenzirovaniya statey, napravlennyh v redakciyu recenziruemogo izdaniya

2.1 Izdanie osuschestvlyaet recenzirovanie vseh postupayuschih v redakciyu materialov, sootvetstvuyuschih tematike, s cel'yu ih ekspertnoy ocenki. Vse recenzenty yavlyayutsya priznannymi specialistami po tematike recenziruemyh materialov i imeyut v techenie poslednih 3 let (k momentu polucheniya rukopisi) publikacii po tematike recenziruemoy stat'i.

2.2 Postupivshaya rukopis' prohodit process pervichnoy ocenki, s pozicii sootvetstviya formal'nym trebovaniyam izdaniya, a imenno: tematike zhurnala i perechnyu podderzhivaemyh nauchnyh special'nostey, pravilam oformleniya statey, original'nosti, yasnosti i logichnosti izlozheniya. V sluchae nesootvetstviya etim trebovaniyam stat'ya ne prinimaetsya k rassmotreniyu, o chem redakciya izveschaet avtora, s ukazaniem prichiny otkaza.

2.3 Reshenie o sootvetstvii rukopisi formal'nym trebovaniyam izdaniya prinimaetsya v techenie 15 dney, nachinaya s daty postupleniya rukopisi v redakciyu.

2.4 Recenzentom ne mozhet byt' avtor ili soavtor recenziruemoy stat'i, a takzhe nauchnye rukovoditeli soiskateley uchenoy stepeni i sotrudniki podrazdeleniya, v kotorom rabotaet avtor, predstavivshiy stat'yu. Recenzenty ne imeyut prava ispol'zovat' v lichnyh celyah recenziruemye rukopisi i peredavat' ih tret'im licam. Srok recenzirovaniya rukopisey ne dolzhen prevyshat' 30 kalendarnyh dney s momenta napravleniya rukopisi recenzentu. Okonchatel'noe reshenie ob opublikovanii postupivshih materialov redakciya zhurnala prinimaet posle rassmotreniya originala recenzii.

2.5 Redakciya izdaniya napravlyaet avtoram predstavlennyh materialov kopii recenziy ili motivirovannyy otkaz, a takzhe obyazuetsya napravlyat' kopii recenziy v Ministerstvo nauki i vysshego obrazovaniya Rossiyskoy Federacii pri postuplenii sootvetstvuyuschego zaprosa.

3. Trebovaniya k soderzhaniyu recenzii

3.1 Recenziya dolzhna soderzhat' ob'ektivnyy analiz rukopisi, otrazhat' ocenku kachestva rukopisi ekspertom.

3.2 Recenziya sostavlyaetsya po standartnoy forme, predlagaemoy redakciey, ili v svobodnom vide i dolzhna soderzhat' sleduyuschie elementy:

– aktual'nost' tematiki issledovaniya, predstavlennoy v rukopisi;

– nauchnaya novizna materialov;

– sootvetstvie soderzhaniya rukopisi ee nazvaniyu;

– sootvetstvie ispol'zovannyh avtorom metodik, rekomendaciy i rezul'tatov issledovaniya sovremennym dostizheniyam nauki i praktiki;

– dostovernost' izlozhennyh faktov, polnota raskrytiya temy;

– celesoobraznost' i obosnovannost' nalichiya v rukopisi tablic, grafikov, inyh illyustracionnyh i demonstracionnyh materialov;

– sootvetstvie vyvodov celyam i zadacham issledovaniya, ih argumentirovannost';

– kachestvo prorabotki literaturnyh istochnikov;

– ocenka lichnogo vklada avtora rukopisi v reshenie izuchaemoy problemy;

– kachestvo oformleniya rukopisi: stil', terminologiya, formulirovki.

3.3 Zaklyuchitel'naya chast' recenzii dolzhna soderzhat' rekomendaciyu:

– ob opublikovanii rukopisi v zhurnale;

– o dorabotke rukopisi (s ukazaniem konkretnyh zamechaniy ili rekomendaciy);

– ob otklonenii rukopisi (s obosnovaniem mneniya eksperta).

3.4 Recenziya podpisyvaetsya ekspertom s rasshifrovkoy ego familii, imeni i otchestva, prostanovkoy daty, ukazaniem uchenoy stepeni, uchenogo zvaniya i zanimaemoy dolzhnosti na moment rassmotreniya rukopisi.

3.5 Original recenzii napravlyaetsya v redakcionnuyu kollegiyu zhurnala.

4. Poryadok predstavleniya recenzii avtoram

4.1 Recenziya (libo ee chast') napravlyaetsya glavnym redaktorom zhurnala ili ego zamestitelem po zaprosu avtora rukopisi, bez ukazaniya familii, dolzhnosti i mesta raboty recenzenta.

4.2 Pri polozhitel'noy ocenke rukopisi recenzentom i redakcionnoy kollegiey zhurnala, glavnyy redaktor ili ego zamestitel' soobschaet avtoru o prinyatii ego rukopisi i planiruemom sroke opublikovaniya predstavlennyh materialov.

4.3 Pri vydache recenzentom rekomendaciy po dorabotke ili zamechaniy rukopis' napravlyaetsya avtoru s ukazaniem sroka, v techenie kotorogo eti zamechaniya dolzhny byt' ustraneny, a rukopis' dorabotana. Dorabotannaya rukopis' s otvetami avtora na zamechaniya (rekomendacii) napravlyaetsya na povtornoe rassmotrenie etomu zhe recenzentu.

4.4 V sluchae konflikta interesov ili nesoglasiya avtora s zamechaniyami (rekomendaciyami) recenzenta, rukopis', po hodataystvu avtora, mozhet byt' napravlena na povtornoe recenzirovanie drugomu ekspertu.

4.5 Pri poluchenii otricatel'noy recenzii na rukopis' redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala imeet pravo napravit' materialy na dopolnitel'noe recenzirovanie ili dorabotku avtoru s posleduyuschim povtornym recenzirovaniem, ili otklonit' rukopis'.

4.6 V sluchae otkloneniya rukopisi avtoru napravlyaetsya pis'mo s ukazaniem prichin otkaza prinyat' materialy k opublikovaniyu.

5. Zaklyuchenie

5.1 Recenzii hranyatsya v redakcii zhurnala v techenie 5 let.

5.2 Recenzii predstavlyayutsya v VAK pri Ministerstve nauki i vysshego obrazovaniya Rossiyskoy Federacii pri nalichii zaprosa so storony VAK.

Founder: Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution Of Higher Education “Yaroslavl State Technical University”

Editorial office address: 88, Moskovsky Prosp., Yaroslavl, 150023, Russia

Published with the assistance of Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences

Registration: Certificate EL No FS 77 - 79733 (27 November 2020)

Frequency: Quarterly

Subscription and distribution: Open Access

Publisher: Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution Of Higher Education “Yaroslavl State Technical University"

Publisher  addres: 88, Moskovsky Prosp., Yaroslavl, 150023, Russia

ISSN: 2782-1919

Informaciya dlya avtorov

Redakciya strogo priderzhivaetsya norm i pravil mezhdunarodnoy publikacionnoy etiki.

Pravovuyu osnovu obespecheniya publikacionnoy etiki sostavlyayut mezhdunarodnye standarty: polozheniya II Vsemirnoy konferencii po voprosam soblyudeniya dobrosovestnosti nauchnyh issledovaniy, polozheniya Komiteta po etike nauchnyh publikaciy (The Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE) i normy razdela «Avtorskoe pravo» Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF. 

Predstavlenie stat'i v zhurnal podrazumevaet sleduyuschee:

• rabota ne byla opublikovana v drugom zhurnale;
• rabota ne nahoditsya na rassmotrenii v drugom zhurnale;
• vse soavtory soglasny s publikaciey stat'i;
• polucheno soglasie (v yavnoy ili neyavnoy forme) organizacii, na baze kotoroy  provedeno issledovanie.

Pri predstavlenii rukopisi v zhurnal avtory dolzhny ubedit'sya, chto vse citirovaniya oformleny korrektno, ukazany zaimstvovannye istochniki v podpisyah k risunkam i nadpisyam k tablicam. Esli takovye ne privedeny, predpolagaetsya, chto risunki i tablicy predstavlyayut soboy plod avtorskoy deyatel'nosti. Redakciya osuschestvlyaet proverku statey na antiplagiat i otklonyaet ili vozvraschaet avtoram rukopisi, esli original'nost' tekstov po rezul'tatam takoy proverki ne dostigaet 70-75 %.

Avtorskie prava

Avtory, napravlyayuschie svoi raboty v zhurnal, soglashayutsya so sleduyuschim:

1. Avtory sohranyayut za soboy avtorskie prava na rabotu i predostavlyayut zhurnalu pravo pervoy publikacii.
2. Avtory sohranyayut za soboy pravo zaklyuchat' otdel'nye kontraktnye dogovorennosti, kasayuschiesya neeksklyuzivnogo rasprostraneniya versii raboty v opublikovannom v zhurnale vide (naprimer, razmeschenie v institutskom hranilische, publikaciya v knige), so ssylkoy na original'nuyu publikaciyu v dannom zhurnale.

Privatnost'

Imena i adresa elektronnoy pochty, vvedennye na sayte dannogo zhurnala, ispol'zuyutsya isklyuchitel'no dlya dostizheniya celey, sovpadayuschih s missiey zhurnala; dostup k nim inyh lic i organizaciy dlya drugih celey ne predostavlyaetsya.

Pravila oformleniya statey dlya zhurnala

«Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve» / «Smart Comprosite in Construction»

V zhurnale «Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve Smart Composite in Construction» pechatayutsya raboty prepodavateley i sotrudnikov vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy RF, RAN, RAASN i drugih issledovatel'skih organizaciy, rabotayuschih v sfere promyshlennogo i grazhdanskogo stroitel'stva i arhitektury, v tom chisle – zarubezhnyh.

Rubriki zhurnala

• Stroitel'nye konstrukcii, zdaniya i sooruzheniya (tehnicheskie)
• Stroitel'nye materialy i izdeliya (tehnicheskie)
• Proektirovanie i stroitel'stvo dorog, metropolitenov, aerodromov, mostov i transportnyh tonneley (tehnicheskie)
• Arhitektura zdaniy i sooruzheniy. Tvorcheskie koncepcii arhitekturnoy deyatel'nosti (tehnicheskie nauki; arhitektura)

Stat'i, napravlyaemye v zhurnal, dolzhny udovletvoryat' sleduyuschim trebovaniyam:

1. Stat'ya dolzhna sootvetstvovat' profilyu i rubrikam zhurnala, obladat' aktual'nost'yu, noviznoy, imet' prikladnoe znachenie (i/ili teoreticheskoe obosnovanie). Vopros ob opublikovanii ili otklonenii stat'i reshaet redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala, i ee reshenie yavlyaetsya okonchatel'nym.
2. Stat'i dolzhny predstavlyat' szhatoe, konkretnoe izlozhenie rezul'tatov, bez povtoreniya odnih i teh zhe dannyh v tekste, risunkah i tablicah.
3. Vse predstavlennye stat'i dolzhny byt' nabrany 12 keglem, shrift Times New Roman, interval – 1.1. Polya: verhnee i nizhnee – 3 sm, levoe i pravoe – 2.5 sm. Abzacnyy otstup – 0.75 sm. Ob'em stat'i – 7-15 stranic, vklyuchaya annotaciyu i spisok literatury na russkom i angliyskom yazykah; chislo tablic – ne bolee 3, risunkov – ne bolee 5-6, dlya obzornoy stat'i – ne bolee 8, v tom chisle pomechennyh bukvami a, b (kursiv) i t.d. Risunki, kak i tablicy, podpisi i zagolovki k nim, a takzhe primechaniya, razmeschayutsya po tekstu stat'i. V razdel «Obzornye stat'i» prinimayutsya materialy ob'emom ot 20 do 30-35 stranic.
4. Pri oformlenii stat'i rekomenduetsya izbegat' upotrebleniya lyubyh sokrascheniy, krome obscheprinyatyh. Pervoe upominanie sokraschennogo termina obyazatel'no sleduet posle ego predstavleniya v polnom vide. Rukopisnye vstavki ne dopuskayutsya. Kavychki oformlyayutsya «elochkoy». Tekst nabiraetsya bez numeracii stranic.

Struktura stat'i

Pervaya stranica rukopisi oformlyaetsya shriftom s razmerom 12 pt. Na pervoy stroke ukazyvaetsya tip stat'i s vyravnivaniem sleva bez abzacnyh otstupov (Nauchnaya stat'ya, Obzornaya stat'ya). Na sleduyuschey stroke prostavlyaetsya indeks po universal'noy desyatichnoy klassifikacii (UDK). Posle UDK propuskaetsya odna stroka i daetsya po centru naimenovanie raboty (poluzhirnoe nachertanie). Propuskaetsya odna stroka i privodyatsya I.O. Familiya (poluzhirnoe nachertanie) kazhdogo avtora. Posle familii kazhdogo avtora nadstrochnym simvolom ukazyvaetsya snoska na affiliaciyu v vide cifry. Esli vse avtory predstavlyayut odnu i tu zhe organizaciyu, cifrovoe oboznachenie affiliacii ne ukazyvaetsya. Propuskaetsya odna stroka, nachinaya s pervogo nadstrochnogo nomera affiliacii, privoditsya polnoe Imya, Otchestvo, Familiya avtora (ili avtorov, esli takovyh, predstavlyayuschih dannuyu organizaciyu, neskol'ko), zatem, na sleduyuschey stroke  – naimenovanie organizacii (mesta raboty), goroda, strany i elektronnyy adres (kursiv) kazhdogo avtora iz dannoy organizacii. Propuskaetsya odna stroka i privoditsya polnoe Imya, Otchestvo, Familiya avtora (ili avtorov) drugoy organizacii, a na sleduyuschey stroke – naimenovanie drugoy organizacii (mesta raboty), goroda, strany i elektronnyy adres (kursiv). Propuskaetsya stroka, razmeschaetsya annotaciya so slov «Annotaciya.» ('Abstract.') (s tochkoy). Tekst annotacii dolzhen vklyuchat' 150-250 slov, vypolnennyh kursivnym nezhirnym nachertaniem, i zavershaetsya tochkoy. Posle annotacii i propuska odnoy stroki nabiraetsya «Klyuchevye slova:» ('Keywords:') (s dvoetochiem) i privoditsya 6-10 slovosochetaniy s kursivnym nachertaniem, bez tochki v konce. Cherez stroku ukazyvaetsya avtor, otvetstvennyy za perepisku, i ego elektronnaya pochta (kursivom). Vse vysheopisannye punkty sledom privodyatsya na angliyskom yazyke.

Blagodarnosti organizaciyam, nauchnym rukovoditelyam i drugim licam, okazavshim pomosch' pri napisanii stat'i, privodyatsya posle slova «Blagodarnosti:». Na angliyskom yazyke slova blagodarnosti privodyatsya posle slova 'Acknowledgments:'

Svedeniya o grantah i finansirovanii issledovaniya pri podgotovke i publikacii stat'i mogut byt' privedeny posle slova «Finansirovanie:» (na angliyskom yazyke – posle slov 'Funding:' ili 'Financial Support:').

Na pervoy stranice rukopisi (esli stat'ya predstavlena na angliyskom yazyke) vse vysheopisannye punkty privodyatsya tol'ko na angliyskom yazyke.

Osnovnoy tekst nauchnoy stat'i rekomenduetsya izlagat' soglasno strukture IMRAD, soderzhaschey sleduyuschie zagolovki: Vvedenie, Eksperimental'naya chast', Rezul'taty i ih obsuzhdenie, Vyvody, Spisok istochnikov. Kazhdyy zagolovok privoditsya propisnymi bukvami vysotoy 12 pt i vydelyaetsya odnoy pustoy strokoy pered nim i posle nego.

Risunki oformlyayutsya vnutri teksta, perenos strok podpisey na druguyu stranicu ne dopuskaetsya. Podpisi k risunkam privodyatsya srazu pod graficheskim izobrazheniem. Podpis' risunka sostavlyaetsya iz sokrascheniya «Ris.» (ili 'Fig.' dlya stat'i na angliyskom yazyke ili dlya perevoda podpisi), poryadkovogo nomera i otdelennogo tochkoy nazvaniya risunka, pri etom tekst, krome samogo nazvaniya, vydelyaetsya poluzhirnym nachertaniem. Sledom v stat'e na russkom yazyke privoditsya podpis' risunka na angliyskom yazyke. Esli risunok sostoit iz neskol'kih chastey, pomechennyh otdel'nymi bukvami, perenos lyuboy chasti risunka i primechaniya v vide bukvy na druguyu stranicu ne rekomenduetsya. Rekomenduetsya umen'shenie shrifta dlya podpisi do 10 pt (dopuskaetsya do 8 pt). Risunki raspolagayutsya tol'ko posle ih upominaniya (ili perekrestnoy ssylki) v tekste stat'i. Ssylka na kazhdyy risunok po tekstu stat'i privoditsya v obyazatel'nom poryadke i  privoditsya v skobkah s sokrascheniem «ris.» ('Fig.'), posle kotorogo ukazyvaetsya nomer, naprimer: (ris. 1) – pri predstavlenii raboty na russkom yazyke, (Fig. 1) – pri predstavlenii raboty na angliyskom yazyke.

Formuly rekomenduetsya oformlyat' vnutri tablicy, sostoyaschey iz dvuh stolbcov. V pervom stolbce privoditsya sama formula, oformlennaya redaktorom formul ili v vide izobrazheniya. Vo vtorom stolbce shirinoy 1 sm privoditsya poryadkovyy nomer formuly, zaklyuchennyy v skobki pri sozdanii perekrestnyh ssylok v tekste. Esli neobhodimost' davat' perekrestnye ssylki otsutstvuet, vtoroy stolbec ne sozdayut. Posle formuly stavitsya zapyataya, kogda privoditsya rasshifrovka simvolov formuly, ili tochka; poryadkovyy nomer formuly posle zapyatoy ili tochki raspolagaetsya na etoy zhe stroke, s vyravnivaniem po pravomu krayu.

Dlya stateynyh tablic privoditsya oboznachenie «Tablica» (ili 'Table' dlya stat'i na angliyskom yazyke), poryadkovyy nomer (bez oboznacheniya znaka nomera), a posle tochki daetsya naimenovanie tablicy. Tekst, krome samogo naimenovaniya tablicy vydelyaetsya poluzhirnym nachertaniem. Sledom v stat'e na russkom yazyke privoditsya nazvanie tablicy na angliyskom yazyke. Rekomenduetsya umen'shenie shrifta v tablice do 10 pt (dopuskaetsya do 8 pt). Tablicy raspolagayutsya tol'ko posle ih upominaniya (ili perekrestnoy ssylki) v tekste stat'i. Upominanie privedennoy tablicy po tekstu stat'i yavlyaetsya obyazatel'nym i privoditsya v skobkah, v kotoryh dayut oboznachenie, naprimer: (tabl. 1) – pri predstavlenii raboty na russkom yazyke, ( Table 1) – pri predstavlenii raboty na angliyskom yazyke.

Stat'ya zakanchivaetsya razdelom «Spisok istochnikov» (v stat'e na angliyskom yazyke –  razdelom 'References'), shrift Times New Roman, kegl' 10 pt. Optimal'noe kolichestvo citirovannyh istochnikov ot 15 do 20 (no ne menee 10), pri etom v spisok rekomenduetsya vklyuchit' ne menee 3 rabot, predstavlyayuschih zhurnaly iz yadra RINC ili vhodyaschih v bazy dannyh WoS/Scopus. V obzornyh rabotah prinimaetsya ne menee 40-50 ssylok na literaturnye istochniki. Pod spiskom literaturnyh istochnikov privodyatsya nadpisi kursivom, kazhdaya – s novoy stroki: «Postupila v redakciyu», «Odobrena posle recenzirovaniya», «Prinyata k opublikovaniyu».

Format

Redakciya prinimaet teksty, sohranennye v formatah .doc. ili .docx. Materialy, ne sootvetstvuyuschie ukazannym trebovaniyam i predstavlennye v drugih formatah, ne rassmatrivayutsya.

Oformlenie literaturnyh ssylok

Vse zatekstovye bibliograficheskie ssylki v stat'e na russkom yazyke sostavlyayut po GOST R 7.0.5 i GOST R 7.0.100, v stat'e na angliyskom yazyke – soglasno mezhdunarodnomu stilyu oformleniya Harvard.

Dopolnitel'no v stat'e na russkom yazyke privodyat perechen' zatekstovyh bibliograficheskih ssylok na latinice ('References'), soglasno mezhdunarodnomu stilyu oformleniya Harvard.

Izdaniya, kotorye ne perevodyatsya, neobhodimo ukazat' transliteraciey v sootvetstvii s obscheprinyatymi mezhdunarodnymi pravilami, v konce kazhdogo takogo istochnika dolzhna stoyat' pometka (in Russian) (sm. http://www.cas.org/expertise/cascontent/caplus/corejournals.html).

Dlya zhurnal'noy stat'i dolzhny byt' ukazany familii i inicialy vseh avtorov, nazvanie stat'i, sokraschennoe nazvanie zhurnala (esli dopuskaetsya, naprimer: Izv. vuzov. Himiya i him. tehnologiya) god, nomer toma, nomer ili vypusk, diapazon stranic i DOI (pri ih nalichii, v sluchae, esli citiruemaya stat'ya napechatana na russkom yazyke).

Primery oformleniya literaturnyh istochnikov (stat'i, monografii, patenty na izobretenie, internet-dannye)
na russkom i angliyskom yazykah

SPISOK ISTOChNIKOV

1. Treybaks E.A. Ispol'zovanie unikal'nyh svoystv kleenyh derevyannyh paneley CLT v stroitel'stve obschestvennyh zdaniy // Innovacii v nauke. 2017.  № 10 (71). S. 68-69.

2. Ammari M.S., Belhadj B., Bederina M., Ferhat A., Quéneudec M. Contribution of hybrid fibers on the improvement of sand concrete properties: Barley straws treated with hot water and steel fibers // Construction and building materials. 2020. Vol. 233, no. 8. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.117374

3. Titunin A.A., Zayceva K.V. Proektirovanie i proizvodstvo stroitel'nyh materialov iz drevesiny. Kompleksnyy podhod. Kostroma: Izd-vo Kostrom. gos. tehnol. un-ta, 2009. 185 s.

4. Yargina Z.N. Estetika goroda. M.: Stroyizdat, 1991. 365 s.

5. V Rossii budet obespecheno shirokoe vnedrenie mnogoetazhnogo derevyannogo domostroeniya // Minstroy Rossii: [sayt]. URL: https://minstroyrf.gov.ru/press/v-rossii-budet-obespecheno-shirokoe-vnedrenie-mnogoetazhnogo-derevyannogo-domostroeniya/ (data obrascheniya 10.10.2023). 

6. Citation guides / Mendeley [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: https://www.mendeley.com/guides/citation-guides/ (data obrascheniya: 05.04.2022).

7. Patent № 2667367 Rossiyskaya Federaciya, MPK B28C 5/00 (2006.01), B28C 9/02 (2006.01). Sposob polucheniya betonnoy smesi s utilizaciey ranee poluchennyh ostatkov etoy smesi: opubl. 19.09.2018 / Kogan Artem Sergeevich.

Postupila v redakciyu 
Odobrena posle recenzirovaniya 
Prinyata k opublikovaniyu

REFERENCES

1. Treybaks, E. A. (2017) Utilization of unique properties of glued wood CLT panels in the construction of public buildings, Innovatsii v nauke, 10(71), pp. 68-69 (in Russian).

2. Ammari, M. S., Belhadj, B., Bederina, M., Ferhat, A. & Quéneudec, M. (2020) Contribution of hybrid fibers on the improvement of sand concrete properties: Barley straws treated with hot water and steel fibers, Construction and Building Materials, 233(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117374.

3. Titunin, A. A. & Zaitseva, K. V. (2009) Design and production of construction materials of wood. Complex approach. Kostroma: Izd-vo Kostrom. gos. tekhnol. un-ta (in Russian).

4. Yargina, Z. N. (1991) Aesthetics of the city. Moscow: Stroyizdat (in Russian).

5. Ministry of Construction of Russia. (2022) Russia will ensure widespread introduction of multi-storey wooden house building [online]. Available at: https://minstroyrf.gov.ru/press/v-rossii-budet-obespecheno-shirokoe-vnedrenie-mnogoetazhnogo-derevyannogo-domostroeniya (accessed 10.10.2023) (in Russian).

6. Citation Guides / Mendeley [online]. Available at: https://www.mendeley.com/guides/citation-guides/ (accessed 05.04.2022).

7. Ferrari, G., Surico, F., Brocchi, A., Banfi, E., Maltese, C. & Squinzi, M. (2019) Method for recycling concrete, IT, Patent EP 2,468,695 A1.

Received
Approved after reviewing
Accepted

Publication Ethics

Ethical standards for publication exist to ensure high-quality scientific publications, public trust in scientific findings, and that people receive credit for their work and ideas. Journal Smart Composite in Construction publication ethics and research integrity help to ensure the accuracy and trustworthiness of an article. We adhere the provisions of the II World Conference on the Integrity of Scientific Research, the provisions of the Committee on Ethics of Scientific Publications (The Committee on Publication Ethics – COPE).

1. Authorship and Authors' Responsibilities

1.1. When submitting a manuscript to the Journal, author (authors) confirming the manuscript has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract, a published lecture or academic thesis), the manuscript is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and checked for plagiarism from other publications. In case the work is based on material previously published as a report, preprint, proceedings, etc. author (authors) should inform the Editorial Board.

1.2. Authors are the persons who have contributed sufficiently to the research, analysis, etc. to be listed on the byline of the manuscript. Before submitting, all authors must approve the manuscript and give their consent for submission and publication. The Corresponding author takes primary responsibility for communication with the Journal during the manuscript submission, peer review, and publication process. The Corresponding Author informs the co-authors of the manuscript’s status throughout the submission, review, and publication process.

1.3. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation.

1.4. The author (authors) guarantees the absence of plagiarism in the manuscript. In case the fragments of works or statements of other persons are used, the authors provide appropriate bibliographic references or citations. In case of using of other researchers works or statements, the authors provide appropriate bibliographic references or quotations.

1.5. Authors should prevent self-plagiarism and refer to their previous works correctly. Author (authors) is not allowed to present the identical data in several publications, copying and paraphrasing the same information.

1.6. The authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed as influencing the results or interpretation of their manuscript.

1.7. When an author (authors) discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the authors obligation to promptly notify the Journal Editor and cooperate with the Journal to retract or correct the work.

2. Reviewers Roles and Responsibilities

2.1. Reviewing upholds the integrity of the Journal by identifying invalid research and helping to maintain the quality of the Journal. Our collaborative peer review maximizes manuscript quality by using a rigorous, constructive, and transparent review process managed by active researchers. Moreover, reviewing is a necessary component of formal scholarly communications providing accomplished academic approach. We believe, the authors can ensure the rigorous standards of the scientific process by taking part in the peer-review system.

2.2. An insufficiently competent or time-constrained reviewer should promptly notify the Editor and request to be excluded from the manuscript review process.

2.3. Any manuscript submitted is a confidential document. This paper not be discussed with any other individual not authorised by the Editor.

2.4. The reviewer is obliged to assess the manuscript objectively. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.

2.5. Reviewers should pay attention to substantial drawbacks and gaps in the references. Any statement (argument, conclusion, etc.) published previously in the manuscript should be accompanied by an appropriate reference. Reviewers should identify works that are relevant to the paper, which were not referred to by the authors. Every allegation that an observation, conclusion, or argument has been made previously must be supported by a reference. The reviewer should also draw the Editor's attention to any significant similarities and intersections between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which he or she is personally aware.

2.6. Unpublished materials contained in the submitted manuscript should not be used in the reviewer's own research without the explicit written consent of the author (authors). The information or ideas obtained during the review should remain confidential and not be used for personal purposes until the publication of the paper and without the permission of the author (authors). Information or ideas obtained during the reviewing related to benefits should be kept confidential.

2.7. Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, and other interactions and relationships with any of the authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.

3. Editors Responsibilities

3.1. The Editor of the Journal is solely and independently responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the Journal should be published. Validation of the work in question and of its importance to researchers and readers must always support such decisions. Basis of the publication decision is always the scientific relevance of the work, its relevance and significance, scientific novelty, and reliability.

The Editor makes objective decision regardless of commercial considerations and provides fair and efficient review process.

3.2. The Editor evaluates the articles for their intellectual content, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

3.3. The Editor should not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial consultants, and the publisher, as the case may be.

3.4. Editors manage conflict situations arising in the process and use all available methods to resolve them.

3.5. An Editor presented with convincing evidence that the substance or conclusions of a published article are erroneous should promote the publication of a correction or retraction.

4. Publisher Responsibilities 

4.1. The publisher follows principles and procedures that facilitate the performance of ethical duties by editors, reviewers, and authors in accordance with these requirements. The publisher should be sure that its overall revenue setting did not influence the Editors' decision making.

4.2. The publisher should adopt policies and procedures that support editors, reviewers, and authors of the Journal in performing their ethical duties under these ethics guidelines. The publisher should support editors in the review of complaints raised concerning ethical issues and help communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors.

4.3. The publisher should develop codes of practice and inculcate industry standards for best practice on ethical matters, errors, and retractions.

5. Articles withdrawal and retraction

When considering situations related to the withdrawal(retraction) of articles, the Editorial Board and publisher of the Journal Smart Composites in Construction are guided by the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE Retraction Guidelines) and Alliance of Independent Regional Publishers, AIRP (The Rules of Withdrawal (Retraction) of an Article from Publication).

Reasons for withdrawal of an article:

• falsification is publishing data or conclusions that were not generated by experiments or observations by data manipulation.
• duplication of submitted materials in several editions.
• plagiarism.

If authors wish to withdraw an article after it has been accepted, they should communicate their decision to the Journal's Editorial Board as soon as possible. The process may involve sending an official withdrawal request along with a brief explanation of the reason for the withdrawal.

After withdrawal, the article remains on the Journal's website as part of the corresponding issue and retains the DOI identifier but is marked as withdrawn one. A note to that effect is made in the issues' Table of Contents. The original article is retained unchanged except for a watermark on the .pdf indicating on each page that it is “retracted.”

The Editorial Board publishes a statement on the withdrawal of the article with the reasons and the date of retraction on the official website of the Journal and in the forthcoming printed issue.

Information on withdrawal of the article and its PDF-version with appropriate labelling are sent to the National Electronic Library (elibrary.ru) and other bibliographic bases the Journal included. The information is also submitted to the Alliance of Independent Regional Publishers, AIRP for entry it into the Unified Database of Retracted Articles.

Publication fee

No fee is charged from the authors during the submission, evaluation, and publication process.

The Editorial Board does not charge the authors for the manuscript submission, reviewing, or publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in own research without the express written consent of the author (authors).

Information or ideas obtained during the reviewing related to benefits should be kept confidential.

Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, and other interactions and relationships with any of the authors, companies or other organizations associated with the submitted work.

Plagiarism

The Editorial Board of the Journal  Smart Composites in Construction, when reviewing the manuscript can undergo a multi-step anti-plagiarism check independently verify the received materials using the Anti-Plagiarism system. In case of plagiarism detection, the Editorial Board acts in accordance with COPE rules.

Preprint and Postprint Policy

When submitting an article, the author is required to confirm the manuscript has not been published or accepted for publication in another scientific Journal. When referring to an article published in the Journal Smart Composites in Construction, the publisher asks you to place a link (the full URL of the material) on the official website of the Journal.

Articles previously posted by authors on personal or public sites not affiliated with other publishers are allowed for review

Polozhenie o recenzirovanii rukopisey v zhurnale

«Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve» / «Smart Comprosite in Construction»

1. Obschie polozheniya

1.1 Nastoyaschee Polozhenie ustanavlivaet proceduru ekspertnoy ocenki rukopisey, napravlyaemyh v redakciyu zhurnala «Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve Smart Composite in Construction».

1.2 Cel'yu ekspertnoy ocenki yavlyaetsya obespechenie vysokogo kachestva materialov, publikuemyh na stranicah zhurnala.

1.3 Dannoe Polozhenie razrabotano v sootvetstvii s publikacionnoy etikoy zhurnala «Umnye kompozity v stroitel'stve Smart Composite in Construction». 

2. Poryadok recenzirovaniya statey, napravlennyh v redakciyu recenziruemogo izdaniya

2.1 Izdanie osuschestvlyaet recenzirovanie vseh postupayuschih v redakciyu materialov, sootvetstvuyuschih tematike, s cel'yu ih ekspertnoy ocenki. Vse recenzenty yavlyayutsya priznannymi specialistami po tematike recenziruemyh materialov i imeyut v techenie poslednih 3 let (k momentu polucheniya rukopisi) publikacii po tematike recenziruemoy stat'i.

2.2 Postupivshaya rukopis' prohodit process pervichnoy ocenki, s pozicii sootvetstviya formal'nym trebovaniyam izdaniya, a imenno: tematike zhurnala i perechnyu podderzhivaemyh nauchnyh special'nostey, pravilam oformleniya statey, original'nosti, yasnosti i logichnosti izlozheniya. V sluchae nesootvetstviya etim trebovaniyam stat'ya ne prinimaetsya k rassmotreniyu, o chem redakciya izveschaet avtora, s ukazaniem prichiny otkaza.

2.3 Reshenie o sootvetstvii rukopisi formal'nym trebovaniyam izdaniya prinimaetsya v techenie 15 dney, nachinaya s daty postupleniya rukopisi v redakciyu.

2.4 Recenzentom ne mozhet byt' avtor ili soavtor recenziruemoy stat'i, a takzhe nauchnye rukovoditeli soiskateley uchenoy stepeni i sotrudniki podrazdeleniya, v kotorom rabotaet avtor, predstavivshiy stat'yu. Recenzenty ne imeyut prava ispol'zovat' v lichnyh celyah recenziruemye rukopisi i peredavat' ih tret'im licam. Srok recenzirovaniya rukopisey ne dolzhen prevyshat' 30 kalendarnyh dney s momenta napravleniya rukopisi recenzentu. Okonchatel'noe reshenie ob opublikovanii postupivshih materialov redakciya zhurnala prinimaet posle rassmotreniya originala recenzii.

2.5 Redakciya izdaniya napravlyaet avtoram predstavlennyh materialov kopii recenziy ili motivirovannyy otkaz, a takzhe obyazuetsya napravlyat' kopii recenziy v Ministerstvo nauki i vysshego obrazovaniya Rossiyskoy Federacii pri postuplenii sootvetstvuyuschego zaprosa.

3. Trebovaniya k soderzhaniyu recenzii

3.1 Recenziya dolzhna soderzhat' ob'ektivnyy analiz rukopisi, otrazhat' ocenku kachestva rukopisi ekspertom.

3.2 Recenziya sostavlyaetsya po standartnoy forme, predlagaemoy redakciey, ili v svobodnom vide i dolzhna soderzhat' sleduyuschie elementy:

– aktual'nost' tematiki issledovaniya, predstavlennoy v rukopisi;

– nauchnaya novizna materialov;

– sootvetstvie soderzhaniya rukopisi ee nazvaniyu;

– sootvetstvie ispol'zovannyh avtorom metodik, rekomendaciy i rezul'tatov issledovaniya sovremennym dostizheniyam nauki i praktiki;

– dostovernost' izlozhennyh faktov, polnota raskrytiya temy;

– celesoobraznost' i obosnovannost' nalichiya v rukopisi tablic, grafikov, inyh illyustracionnyh i demonstracionnyh materialov;

– sootvetstvie vyvodov celyam i zadacham issledovaniya, ih argumentirovannost';

– kachestvo prorabotki literaturnyh istochnikov;

– ocenka lichnogo vklada avtora rukopisi v reshenie izuchaemoy problemy;

– kachestvo oformleniya rukopisi: stil', terminologiya, formulirovki.

3.3 Zaklyuchitel'naya chast' recenzii dolzhna soderzhat' rekomendaciyu:

– ob opublikovanii rukopisi v zhurnale;

– o dorabotke rukopisi (s ukazaniem konkretnyh zamechaniy ili rekomendaciy);

– ob otklonenii rukopisi (s obosnovaniem mneniya eksperta).

3.4 Recenziya podpisyvaetsya ekspertom s rasshifrovkoy ego familii, imeni i otchestva, prostanovkoy daty, ukazaniem uchenoy stepeni, uchenogo zvaniya i zanimaemoy dolzhnosti na moment rassmotreniya rukopisi.

3.5 Original recenzii napravlyaetsya v redakcionnuyu kollegiyu zhurnala.

4. Poryadok predstavleniya recenzii avtoram

4.1 Recenziya (libo ee chast') napravlyaetsya glavnym redaktorom zhurnala ili ego zamestitelem po zaprosu avtora rukopisi, bez ukazaniya familii, dolzhnosti i mesta raboty recenzenta.

4.2 Pri polozhitel'noy ocenke rukopisi recenzentom i redakcionnoy kollegiey zhurnala, glavnyy redaktor ili ego zamestitel' soobschaet avtoru o prinyatii ego rukopisi i planiruemom sroke opublikovaniya predstavlennyh materialov.

4.3 Pri vydache recenzentom rekomendaciy po dorabotke ili zamechaniy rukopis' napravlyaetsya avtoru s ukazaniem sroka, v techenie kotorogo eti zamechaniya dolzhny byt' ustraneny, a rukopis' dorabotana. Dorabotannaya rukopis' s otvetami avtora na zamechaniya (rekomendacii) napravlyaetsya na povtornoe rassmotrenie etomu zhe recenzentu.

4.4 V sluchae konflikta interesov ili nesoglasiya avtora s zamechaniyami (rekomendaciyami) recenzenta, rukopis', po hodataystvu avtora, mozhet byt' napravlena na povtornoe recenzirovanie drugomu ekspertu.

4.5 Pri poluchenii otricatel'noy recenzii na rukopis' redakcionnaya kollegiya zhurnala imeet pravo napravit' materialy na dopolnitel'noe recenzirovanie ili dorabotku avtoru s posleduyuschim povtornym recenzirovaniem, ili otklonit' rukopis'.

4.6 V sluchae otkloneniya rukopisi avtoru napravlyaetsya pis'mo s ukazaniem prichin otkaza prinyat' materialy k opublikovaniyu.

5. Zaklyuchenie

5.1 Recenzii hranyatsya v redakcii zhurnala v techenie 5 let.

5.2 Recenzii predstavlyayutsya v VAK pri Ministerstve nauki i vysshego obrazovaniya Rossiyskoy Federacii pri nalichii zaprosa so storony VAK.

Abramov Mihail Yaroslavl State Technical University

Aksyonova Karina Ivanovo State Polytechnic University (Department of Costume and Textile Design)

Andreev Roman State Fire Academy of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defence, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters

Andronov Sergey Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov (docent)
candidate of technical sciences

Anisimov Pavel Nikolaevich FGBOU VO "Povolzhskiy gosudarstvennyy tehnologicheskiy universitet"
from 01.01.2012 until now candidate of technical sciences from 01.01.2017 until now

Artamonov Denis Nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy Mordovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. N.P. Ogareva
graduate student of technical sciences

Badelina Anna Ivanovo State Polytechnic University

Bakanov Maksim Ivanovskaya pozharno-spasatel'naya akademiya GPS MChS Rossii (Nachal'nik uchebno-nauchnogo kompleksa «Pozharotushenie»)
doctor of technical sciences
Academic rank Sovetnik RAASN
docent

Balushkin Aleksandr Yaroslavl State Technical University

Balykov Artemiy

Barkaya Temur Tver State Technical University (Department of structures and facilities, Head of the Department of structures and facilities)
from 01.01.2015 until now candidate of technical sciences from 01.01.1999 until now

docent from 01.01.2004 until now

Baruzdin Aleksandr Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs

Belov Vladimir Tver Stare University (Kafedra "proizvodstva stroitel'nyh izdeliy i konstrukciy", Zaveduyuschiy kafedroy)
doctor of technical sciences
Academic rank Sovetnik RAASN
professor

Belozerov Yaroslav Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov

Bessonov Dmitry TOO «PP Avtodor»

Bessonov Mikhail University of Glasgow

Blaznov Aleksey Institute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS) (Laboratory of Mineral Materials Science)
doctor of technical sciences

docent

Boguslavsky Leonid Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs

Borisov Aleksandr Yaroslavl State Technical University

Budanova Ekaterina Yaroslavl State Technical University

• « 
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• …
• 8
•  »

VAC