Kostroma, Kostroma, Russian Federation
The article deals with the problem of redundant paperwork and unnecessary reporting which have overwhelmed state-funded organisations of modern Russia and lead to huge time and effort loss of public sector employees. The purpose of the research is to analyse the causes and results of redundant paperwork using mathematical modelling and to consider the possibilities for its regulation. The model is based on the following assumptions. An agent (employee of a state-run organisation) cannot evade performing a task issued by an official, which provides for drawing up a certain document in the form of a report, plan or programme. An official (a representative of a superior organisation or state governance body) has an uncontrolled possibility to demand the subordinate organisation’s performing the entrusted task within the appointed period. The paper shows that if an official uses such documents for personal purposes he/she is interested in unlimitedly increasing the labour intensity of the reporting burden imposed on the agent. Under the paperwork pressure, the agent has to reduce his/her efforts to comply with the officially prescribed paid duties up to minimising them to a level which completely excludes any activity and initiatives. The obtained results show that there is no reason, nevertheless, to accuse an official seeking to maximise his/her utility function of any hostile intentions. The article discusses four practical measures to limit and regulate the official’s paperwork activity: 1) compensation of efforts of the controlled organisation employees to draft the required documents; 2) imposing an adjustment tax upon the controlling organisation on the use of the controlled organisation’s labour resources; 3) the controlling organisation’s staff reduction with the preservation of all functions and the wage fund; 4) introduction of legislative restrictions on the number, types and volume of documents the controlling organisation has the right to demand from the controlled organisation.
redundant paperwork, bureaucratisation, reporting burden, reporting, paperwork pressure, official
1. Ambarova P.A. Sverhbyurokratizaciya kak anomaliya razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii // Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Ser. 1. Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury. 2018. T. 24, № 1 (171). S. 173-183.
2. Bytko S.Yu. Byurokratizaciya pravoohranitel'noy sistemy kak kriminogennyy faktor // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. 2023. № 4. S. 252-256.
3. Vol'chik V.V., Filonenko Yu.V., Averkieva E.S., Shiryaev I.M. Byurokratizaciya i adaptivnoe povedenie v sfere vysshego obrazovaniya // Journal of Economic Regulation. 2016. № 4. S. 57-71.
4. Golik Yu.V. Byurokratizaciya nauki nedopustima (zametki posle prochteniya knigi V.N. Protasova «Metodologicheskie problemy zaschity dissertaciy (na primere yurisprudencii)» // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2021. № 12. S. 67-72.
5. Kaplun K.R., Truhanovich D.S. Byurokratizaciya obrazovatel'nogo processa kak problema realizacii obrazovatel'noy politiki (na primere Myasnikovskogo rayona Rostovskoy oblasti) // Tendencii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. 2020. № 62-8. S. 89-93.
6. Krasinskaya L.F. Modernizaciya, optimizaciya, byurokratizaciya... Chto ozhidaet vysshuyu shkolu zavtra? // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2016. № 3. S. 73-82.
7. Kurbatova M.V., Donova I.V. Effektivnyy kontrakt v vysshem obrazovanii: rezul'taty realizacii proekta // Journal of Institutional Studies. 2019. № 11(2). S. 122-145.
8. Kurbatova M.V. Reforma vysshego obrazovaniya kak institucional'nyy proekt rossiyskoy byurokratii: soderzhanie i posledstviya // Mir Rossii. 2016. № 4. S. 59-86.
9. Kurbatova M.V., Levin S.N., Sablin K.S. Import instrumentov nauchnoy politiki v sovremennoy Rossii // Journal of Institutional Studies. 2021. № 13(3). S. 37-52.
10. Levin M.I., Levina E.A., Pokatovich E.V. Lekcii po ekonomike korrupcii. M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2011. 356 s.
11. Maksim Oreshkin rasskazal o problemah realizacii nacproektov Ministerstvo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federacii [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/news/maksim_oreshkin_rasskazal_o_sistemnyh_problemah_v_realizacii_nacproektov.html (data obrascheniya: 30.0.2024).
12. Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya, 2 izd. T. 13. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury. 1959. 771 s.
13. Nikonov V. 2015. Kak optimizirovat' otchetnost' v sisteme obrazovaniya? [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa https://russkiymir.ru/publications/189024/ (data obrascheniya: 30.0.2024).
14. Oreshkin predlozhil Kudrinu iskat' vragov v Schetnoy palate [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa https://www.interfax.ru/business/681995 (data obrascheniya: 30.0.2024).
15. Osipov A.M. Byuropatologiya i bumazhnyy pressing v rossiyskom obrazovanii // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sociologiya. 2020. № 4. S. 953-966.
16. Protasov V.N. Irracional'nye metody vlastvovaniya kak instrument samosohraneniya i ekspansii byurokraticheski organizovannyh sistem upravleniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2017. № 10. S. 55-61.
17. Sliva A.V., Berezovskiy V.A., Fokina V.N., Basov V.A. Finansovye i intellektual'nye poteri vuza vsledstvie izlishney byurokratizacii v sisteme obrazovaniya // Ekonomika obrazovaniya. 2015. № 5(90). S. 4-16.
18. Smolin O.N. Vysshee obrazovanie: bor'ba za kachestvo ili pokushenie na chelovecheskiy potencial? (stat'ya 2) // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 7. S. 30-37.
19. Stenograficheskiy otchet o zasedanii Soveta po nauke i obrazovaniyu [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa http://science.gov.ru/events/sten/1923/ (data obrascheniya: 30.0.2024).
20. Tambiyanc Yu.G., Shalin V.V. Byurokratizaciya otechestvennogo vysshego obrazovaniya: faktory i perspektivy // Obschestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul'tura. 2021. № 5. S. 31-39.
21. Tambovcev V.L. Deystvennost' mer rossiyskoy nauchnoy politiki: chto govorit mirovoy opyt // Upravlenie naukoy: teoriya i praktika. 2020. № 1. S. 15-39.
22. Tambovcev V., Rozhdestvenskaya I. Reforma vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii: mezhdunarodnyy opyt i ekonomicheskaya teoriya // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2014. № 4. S. 97-108.
23. Toschenko Zh.T. Vysshee obrazovanie na pereput'e: kuda vedut reformy (zametki skeptika) // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny. 2019. № 4. S. 400-417.
24. Curikov V.I. O vliyanii izbytochnogo dokumentooborota na trudovuyu aktivnost' sotrudnika byudzhetnoy organizacii // Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. 2023. № 1. S. 65-78.
25. Abbott K., Genschel P., Snidal D., Zangl B. Beyond opportunism: intermediary loyalty in regulation and governance // Regulation and Governance. 2021. S1. P. 83-101.
26. Besley T., Burgess R.,Khan A., Xu G. Bureaucracy and Development. // Annual Review of Economics. 2022. No 14. P. 397-424.
27. Cadot O. Corruption as a gamble // Journal of Public Economics. 1987. No 2. P. 223-244.
28. Choi J.P., Thum M. Corruption and the Shadow Economy // International Economic Review. 2005. No 3. P. 817-836.
29. Crawford S.E.S., Ostrom E. A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review. 1995. No 3. P. 582–600.
30. Downs A. Inside Bureaucracy. 1967. Boston: Little Brown and Co. 292 p.
31. Furubotn E.G., Richter R. Institutions and Economic Theory:The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. 2000. University of Michigan Press. 556 p.
32. Gailmard S.F., Patty J.W. Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise // American Journal of Political Science. 2007. No 4. P. 873-889.
33. Holmstrom B.R., Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design // Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 1991. No 7 (special issue). P. 24-52.
34. Niskanen W.A. Peculiar Economics of Bureaucracy // American Economic Review. 1968. No 2. P. 293–305.
35. Niskanen W.A.. Bureaucrats and Politicians // Journal of Law and Economics. 1975. No 3. P. 617–643.
36. Park S. Politics or Bureaucratic Failures? Understanding the Dynamics of Policy Failures in Democratic Governance // Journal of Policy Studies. 2021. No 3. P. 25-36.
37. Prendergast C. The Limits of Bureaucratic Efficiency // Journal of Political Economy. 2003. No 5. P. 929-958.
38. Rose-Ackerman S. Corruption: A Study in Political Economy. Cambridge: Academic Press. 1978. 256 p.
39. Tullock G. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press. 1965. 228 p.
