Minsk, Belarus
Minsk, Belarus
The article presents the conceptual and theoretical foundations of the resource-useful approach to the study of socio-economic systems and processes, actively developed by the Department of Economic Security of the Belarusian State University. It is shown that along with the traditional cost, costly in terms of their political and economic essence, characteristics of socio-economic processes, it is necessary to take into account their useful parameters. The theoretical and practical results achieved within the framework of this approach, which are important for the management of scientific and technological progress in Belarus and Russia and focused on purposefully increasing the level of technological progressivity of their national economies, increasing the level of their technological safety, as well as taking into account the technological aspect of the implemented import substitution policies in both countries. It is concluded that the resource-useful approach to the study of socio-economic systems and processes can be considered as one of the directions within the framework of a comprehensive concept of theoretical economics, which today claims to develop a path for the development of civilization that can lead it to the trajectory of safe, truly sustainable development.
theoretical economy, resource-utility approach to the study of socio-economic systems and processes, sustainable development, scientific and technological progress, technological progressivity of the national economy, technological security, technological function, safe development, import substitution.
1. Aymaletdinova, L.A. Tehnicheskiy progress kak istochnik social'no-ekologicheskogo krizisa sovremennogo obschestva / L.A. Aymaletdinova // Vestnik KGU. 2012. №2. – S. 55-57.
2. Antonova, Yu.I. Sovremennye aspekty global'nyh problem: uchebnoe posobie. – Omsk: IP Ponomareva O.N., 2010. – 64 s.
3. Baynev, V.F. O neobhodimosti vozobnovleniya politiko-ekonomicheskih issledovaniy fundamental'nyh problem nauchno-tehnicheskogo progressa: ocenka urovnya tehnologichnosti ekonomicheskih sistem / V.F. Baynev // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. – 2022. – №9. – S. 14-27.
4. Vahrusheva, N.A. Ot zatrat k rezul'tatam / N.A. Vahrusheva, V.I. Kornyakov // Ekonomika i ekologicheskiy menedzhment. - 2015. - №4. – S. 1-6.
5. Verevichev, V.I. Nauchno-tehnicheskiy progress v kontekste teorii global'nogo evolyucionizma / V.I. Verevichev // Izvestiya Samarskogo centra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. – T. 19. – 2017. – №4(2). – S. 320-326.
6. Vernadskiy, V.I. Biosfera i noosfera / V.I. Vernadskiy. – M.: T8RUGRAM, 2017. – 576 c.
7. Gordeev, V.A. Issledovanie obschestvennogo vosproizvodstva – fundamental'naya osnova razrabotki teoreticheskoy ekonomii / V.A. Gordeev // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. – 2022. – №1. – S. 130-135.
8. Gordeev, V.A. Teoreticheskaya ekonomiya: prodolzhaem razrabotku i razvitie / V.A. Gordeev // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. – 2021. – №5. – S. 5-11.
9. Gordeev, V.A. Teoreticheskaya ekonomiya: «My hotim videt' dal'she…» / V.A. Gordeev // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. – 2021. – №7. – S. 5-12.
10. Gordeev, V.A. Teoreticheskaya ekonomiya: ocherednye shagi razvitiya / V.A. Gordeev // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. – 2020. – №2. – S. 4-11.
11. El'meev, V.Ya. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie i potrebitel'naya sila obschestva / V.Ya. El'meev // Gumanitarnye nauki. – 1997. – №3. – S. 102-106.
12. Kazhuro, N.Ya. Koncepciya ustoychivogo razvitiya kak novaya paradigma obschestvennogo progressa / N.Ya. Kazhuro // Nauka i tehnika. – 2016. – T. 15. – №6. – S. 511-520.
13. Lytkin, V.V. Ponyatie kosmizma i problema ego klassifikacii / V.V. Lytkin // Nauchnye trudy Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo. – 2012. – №8 (127). – S. 265-272.
14. Makkonnel, K.R. Ekonomiks: principy, problemy i politika: per. s 13-go angl. izd. / K.R. Makkonnel, S.L. Bryu. – M.: INFRA-M, 1999. – 974 s.
15. Metodika ocenki srednegodovogo urovnya lokalizacii proizvodstva v celom ili otdel'nogo vnov' osvaivaemogo izdeliya / Postanovlenie Min-va ek-ki Resp. Belarus' i Min-va promyshl. Resp. Belarus' ot 23.03.2012 №20/2 [Elektronnyy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://belzakon.net/Zakonodatel'stvo/Sovmestnye_postanovleniya/2012/57003. – Data dostupa: 21.07.2023.
16. Metodika «Raschet urovnya lokalizacii tovarov, rabot, uslug» MT – 156-2 (Prikaz PAO «Inter RAO», 11 marta 2019 g., № IRAO/139) // PAO «Inter RAO» [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: https://cdn.interrao-zakupki.ru/iblock/8ec/8ec6ae3c25c12fa1e4140b4b7c0c7648/68c6dcb2d8bbac4526d077008f3eadcd.pdf. Data dostupa: 21.07.2023
17. Noosfernaya ekonomika i social'naya politika: strategiya innovacionnogo razvitiya / P. G. Nikitenko. – Minsk: Belorusskaya nauka, 2006. – 478 s.
18. Pryazhnikova, O.N. Social'naya i solidarnaya ekonomika: vozmozhnosti dlya ustoychivogo razvitiya / O.N. Pryazhnikova // Ekonomicheskie i social'nye problemy Rossii. – 2014. – №2. – S. 86-107.
19. Rayzberg, B.A. Opredelenie i obosnovanie stoimosti, cennosti social'no-ekonomicheskih ob'ektov, blag, tovarov, uslug / B.A. Rayzberg // Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. – 2018. – №3. – S. 12-15.
20. Subetto, A.I. Problemy upravleniya noosfernym ustoychivym razvitiem / A.I. Subetto // Teoreticheskaya ekonomika. - 2016. - №4 (34). – S. 7-18.
21. Fedorov, N. Filosofiya obschego dela / N. Fedorov. – M.: EKSMO, 2008. – 752 s.
22. Ciolkovskiy, K.E. Kosmicheskaya filosofiya / K.E. Ciolkovskiy. M.: EKSMO, 2018. – 416 s.
23. Shkiotov, S.V. Paradoksy konkurentosposobnosti nacional'noy ekonomiki: monografiya / S. V. Shkiotov. - Moskva : Ekon-inform, 2014. - 113 s.
24. Shumpeter, Y. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya / Y. Shumpeter. – M.: Progress, 1982. – 455 s.
